OPINION

War

By Tom Cardella
Add Comment Add Comment | Comments: 5 | Posted Jul. 15, 2010

Everybody seems to agree that war is a terrible thing. But some are willing to justify it too easily. Others too readily support it once we’re in. No matter how bad a decision is to go to war, there will always be those that view being there justification in itself for continuing it until we “win.” How often have we heard that we must fight to the finish so that those who have died will not have died in vain? The proposition that more soldiers must die for a lost cause in order to validate the sacrifice of those who have already died, is not only stupid; it is outrageously illogical.

I admit that these are the thoughts that went through my head the other day as I once again watched Oliver Stone’s film “Platoon.” Some Vietnam veterans that I once interviewed told me that “Platoon” came the closest of any film of capturing their experiences in that war. Take the time to read Karl Marlantes’ novel “Matterhorn” and then pop “Platoon” into your DVD player. It might not make you anti-war, but it should help you understand why we ought to be more careful before deciding to send troops into war. We ought to make damn sure of what we’re doing. We shouldn’t send Americans off to die for a flawed domino theory as we did in Vietnam. We shouldn’t send Americans off to die without making sure there are really weapons of mass destruction as we did in Iraq. And after nearly nine years in Afghanistan, we should have figured out by now that al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden are no longer there, and Hamid Karzai isn’t worth one single drop of American blood.

Most of us have never experienced war.We never had to put our lives on the line for a cause we didn’t understand. We never had to stand helplessly by while a friend bled out in some jungle or forlorn hill. I spent a joke six-month tour in the Air Force Reserves back in the early ’60s while the poor kids who couldn’t get a draft deferment were dying in Vietnam. Perhaps I carry around that guilt. Perhaps it is right that myself and others like me should.

Today there is no draft and consequently there are no protests in the street. The wars are fought by the same kind of poor kids who went into the service because they couldn’t find a job, and that same core of patriotic warriors who still believe in duty and country. The rest of us think we are sacrificing when a gallon of gas goes up 20 cents.

I was thinking about how men and women view war differently. Most men who have not served still think of war as a good action film where the good guys win in the end. They don’t search for deeper truths. Most women don’t think much about war unless it involves their own kids. They will tell you they don’t read war novels or watch war films because they don’t like violence. They view war as man’s folly, part of his nature like watching football on weekends. It is kind of the way some males like me view the painful part of childbirth, like something women do, something we weren’t meant to understand.

Sometimes I get disgusted with myself.My history (and it can be seen in some of my columns) has been to reflexively support our wars, whether it be Vietnam, Afghanistan or Iraq. In each and every case, I found that I was wrong, that I accepted the rationale for war too easily. During Vietnam, it took the deaths of thousands of our soldiers and countless civilian casualties and the realization that the CIA had participated in a coup that resulted in the murder of President Ngo Dinh Diem before I cried, “enough.”

It was only after the story was revealed that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq before I concluded that we had no business invading a country that had not harmed us. I once thought our war in Afghanistan was the right war. And at one time it was. But al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden have fled to Pakistan. Once again we are propping up an unpopular and corrupt government. We kill more civilians with our drones than we do terrorists. We can’t win the hearts and minds of the citizens because they know that one day we will be gone and the Taliban will still be there.

Once again history is repeating itself. We have lost our rationale for a war, but can’t seem to find a way out. The Obama Administration is already fudging its deadline of July 2011 to withdraw forces from Afghanistan. The President says that if we leave too soon, al-Qaeda will re-establish terrorist bases. But what is too soon? This is the longest war in our history. To paraphrase the president, if not July 2011, when?

Add to favoritesAdd to Favorites PrintPrint Send to friendSend to Friend

COMMENTS

Comments 1 - 5 of 5
Report Violation

1. Anonymous said... on Jul 18, 2010 at 12:50AM

“When the ANA can step up and take charge in our place. Until then, you have Marines like me ready to take care of business for as long as it takes, doing our best to shrink the grounds of where those who would readily decapitate you live and train. Semper Fi to my South Philly Marines.”

Report Violation

2. steve richter said... on Jul 22, 2010 at 03:19PM

“Mr. Cardella, You are right on as you so often are. The conflict in Iraq and Afg/Pak are both conflicts of choice and have always been. I do not want to see one drop of American blood spilled in either theater and not one dollar spent for military action in either area. US Troops there is an unsound policy and one that gives little or nothing in return. We have often been creating terrorist faster than we can kill them, No fault of our service men and women in the field, but they have been duped as was congress and the sad truth is most American do not even care. It was and has always been about securing cheap oil and "finishing business". The only sane policy and sadly one Pres Obama is afraid to undertake, is a complete military withdrawal. The real heroes are the "Iraq vets against the war."
Leave Iraq ASAP, in Afghanistan try serious and large scale non-military intervention. with a time table and if that does not work we depart there as well.”

Report Violation

3. Anonymous said... on Jul 23, 2010 at 05:51AM

“Mr. Richter, perhaps you would feel more comfortable living in France.”

Report Violation

4. Gloria said... on Jul 27, 2010 at 09:16PM

“I agree entirely with Steve and would like to add that my comments in reply to Janice re the letter "Attacking the Issue" do not appear on this screen.”

Report Violation

5. tom cardella said... on Aug 5, 2010 at 02:04PM

“To the courageous marine who is willing to stay until the job gets done--the problem is the ANA will never be able to step up and take over because the Karzai Government is corrupt and less reliable than the Taliban. The Taliban is there forever because it is their country. One day, we will leave, and the populace knows it...To the the person who suggests we ought to live in France, please don't suggest it is cowardice not to want to squander blood and treasure in another hopeless cause.”

ADD COMMENT

Rate:
(HTML and URLs prohibited)

Related Content

Attacking the issue

I agree with Tom Cardella (“War,” July 15): We should not engage in war without thinking mightily about our rationale. Our last declared war was WWII because we had to defend ourselves from a direct attack.

RELATED: A night worth repeating Hard to comprehend Sharing the road Safeguarding their wheels